EUROPEAN LEADERS FOR CLIMATE

The CSRD allies' movement

We advocate for smart simplification of the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Our goal? To reduce compliance costs without compromising Europe’s climate ambitions.

Join the movement

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Ooops! Form submission failed.
Header image grid.
Header green light and blur.
The movement

Key Proposals

Europe has a thriving tech ecosystem dedicated to sustainability, which should be protected as a strong competitive advantage. We advocate for the continuation of the pro-environmental policies set by the CSRD while working to minimize the financial burden on businesses. This note outlines a series of measures that would significantly reduce compliance costs without compromising climate ambitions.

Process card icon.
Costs
01
Reducing Compliance Costs by Revising Audit Requirements

Eliminate the dominance of large audit firms like KPMG, Deloitte, EY, and PWC, reducing audit costs significantly (from €40-100K to less than €10K).

Green light and grid of the progress.
Process card icon.
Proportionality
02
Strengthening the Principle of Proportionality in Reporting

Tailor the reporting requirements based on company size, sector, and activity level to ensure fairness.

White light and grid of the progress.
Process card icon.
Sector-Specific
03
Publication of Sector-Specific Benchmark Reporting Guidelines

Publish practical guides to identify material ESRS for different industries.

White light and grid of the progress.
Process card icon.
Simplified Reporting
04
Simplified Reporting and Audit Exemptions for SMEs & Mid-Market Companies

Allow SMEs to use simplified audit standards and certified reporting software to reduce costs and improve efficiency.

White light and grid of the progress.

The real suffocation comes from inaction, not transparency.

Critics of the CSRD blame it for Europe's economic struggles, ignoring deeper issues — political instability, energy costs, market stagnation, and weak investment. But the directive isn’t the enemy; it’s a tool to build a resilient, competitive, and sustainable economy.Rather than delay or dismantle it, the focus should be on better implementation, practical guidance, and proportionality— not fear-mongering. The greatest risk for businesses isn't compliance; it's failing to anticipate the inevitable shift towards a low-carbon economy. In the long run, inaction will cost far more than adaptation.

Alexis Normand
Ambassador European Leader For Climate

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras sed vulputate augue. Nullam mauris metus, rhoncus eget urna sagittis, suscipit tincidunt leo. Quisque luctus eget est eu tincidunt. Duis tempor justo vel pharetra blandit. In hac habitasse platea dictumst.

Quisque sollicitudin nisl purus, at bibendum ante aliquam sed. Phasellus risus leo, aliquam sit amet egestas quis, feugiat ut mi. Maecenas feugiat nibh diam

Header avatar image.
Olivia Williams
CEO / Versel

CSRD Materiality Finder - Analysis of applicable ESRS by sector & Benchmarks

More filters

DR S4-5: Objectives related to managing significant negative impacts, enhancing positive impacts, and managing risks and opportunities

S4- Consumers and End-Users

DR G1-6: Payment practices

G1- Business Conduct

DR SBM-1: Strategy, business model, and value chain

Materiality

Like ESRS 2, this is a cross-cutting standard. ESRS1 does not contain disclosure requirements (DR) and defines the structure of the ESRS in 4 pillars: Governance (GOV) Strategy (SBM) Management of impacts, risks, and opportunities (IRO) Measures and targets (MT)

Governance
No results found.
There are no results with this criteria. Try changing your search.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.